Professional Narratives about Older Adults and Health Services Responsive to Fall-Inducing Frailty.

The second external cause of death from unintentional injuries is falls in people over 60 and is a worldwide Public Health problem. Associated factors are identified early in Primary Health Care. Thus, we analyze professional narratives about older adults/old age and the organization of services in the presence of fall-inducing frailty. A structured narrative was applied under the following stages: understanding the context, setting/plot/character analysis, and interpretive synthesis. Data were collected from August to November 2022, distributing 21 health professionals in three Narrative Focus Groups. In the analyses, the collective conceptions dialogued with Bourdieu's Epistemology of field, habitus, and capital. Technical and common sense representations of older adults were simultaneously observed among the results, along with the belief of old age as a problematic life stage. Care is centered on the installed disease/ailment. Encouraging autonomy and self-care emerges in integrative health practices, which older adults underestimate. Professionals access the lives of older adults according to their habitus, which, in turn, is structured (structuring) in the disputes for installed capital. Thus, the care provided disregards subjectivities and symbolic systems associated with falls.

The puritanical moral contract: Purity, cooperation, and the architecture of the moral mind.

Commentators raise fundamental questions about the notion of purity (sect. R1), the architecture of moral cognition (sect. R2), the functional relationship between morality and cooperation (sect. R3), the role of folk-theories of self-control in moral judgment (sect. R4), and the cultural variation of morality (sect. R5). In our response, we address all these issues by clarifying our theory of puritanism, responding to counter-arguments, and incorporating welcome corrections and extensions.

Culturally Adapting Mind-Body Interventions for Black Individuals with Chronic Pain: Arguments and Recommendations Towards a Task-Sharing Approach.

Compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, non-Hispanic Black Individuals report worse chronic pain from a variety of medical issues. Among the options for non-pharmacological pain treatment, mind-body interventions (MBI) are a promising modality to help Black individuals manage their chronic pain effectively. MBIs such as mindfulness meditation improve chronic pain and chronic pain-related outcomes by shifting the individual's perception of pain away from stress-related cognitive appraisals, emotional reactions, and behaviors. MBIs may also address disparities in chronic pain outcomes between Black and White individuals because of their contextual overlap with (1) centering and contemplative prayer, (2) racial empowerment, and (3) social support. Despite this overlap, the demand for MBIs among Black individuals has generally been low due to lingering access and acceptability barriers. To reduce these barriers for Black individuals with chronic pain, we must adopt a community-engaged approach and culturally adapt MBIs for the specific historic, environmental, financial, and psychosocial needs of Black individuals. Example adaptations include increasing Black representation among MBI instructors, reducing geographical access barriers, accommodating the financial and personal realities of Black adults, and explicitly allowing relevant attitudes, practices, and terms.

The theoretical and practical arguments against the unilateral withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment during crisis standards of care: Does the Knobe effect apply to unilateral withdrawal?

Some argue that it is ethically justifiable to unilaterally withdraw life-sustaining treatment during crisis standards of care without the patient's consent in order to reallocate it to another patient with a better chance of survival. This justification has been supported by two lines of argument: the equivalence thesis and the rule of the double effect. We argue that there are theoretical issues with the first and practical ones with the second, as supported by an experiment aimed at exploring whether the Knobe effect, which affects the folk concept of intention, applies to situations of unilateral withdrawal. Fifty-two critical care physicians from one university were asked to ascribe intention in two hypothetical scenarios A and B in which outcomes differ-the patient from whom life-sustaining treatment is withdrawn dies in scenario A but survives in scenario B-but the intention, to save the other patient regardless of the outcome of the other, is the same. The survey was administered via a web-based survey and all answers were anonymous. A paired proportion test was used to compare responses to both questions. All 52 surveyed individuals responded in scenario A and 30 (57.7%) ascribed intention when outcomes were unfavorable, whereas 50 responded in scenario B and 8 (16%) ascribed intention when outcomes were favorable, a difference that was statistically significant (p < 0.001). There are theoretical and practical issues with the arguments proposed to justify the unilateral withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment based on the equivalence thesis and the rule of double effect.

Exploring prospects of deliberation in intractable natural resource management conflicts.

Deliberative processes are increasingly advocated as means to handle intractable natural resource management (NRM) conflicts. Research shows that disputing actors can deliberate and achieve higher degrees of mutual understanding and working agreements under ideal conditions, but the transferability of these findings to real-world intractable NRM conflicts can be questioned. This paper explores the possibilities of designing and realizing deliberation and its expected outcomes in real-world NRM conflicts. We used recommended design principles to set up deliberative processes in two intractable mining conflicts involving indigenous peoples in Northern Sweden and assessed the actors' communication and outcomes using frame analysis. The results show that the recommended design principles are hard, but not impossible, to fully implement in intractable NRM conflicts. Both conflicts proved difficult to deliberate and resolve in the sense of reaching agreements. However, the findings suggest that deliberation, as well as meta-consensus, or structured disagreement, is possible to achieve in settings with favorable conditions, e.g. good and established inter-group relations prior to the conflict. In the absence of these conditions, where relations were hostile and shaped by historical and institutional injustices, deliberation was not achieved. In both cases, polarization among the participants remained, or increased, in spite of the deliberative activities. The study highlights the importance of understanding deliberation as embedded in place specific historical and institutional contexts which shape both process and outcomes in powerful ways. More efforts should focus on alternative, or complementary, ways to handle intractable NRM conflicts, including how contested experiences of history, institutions and Indigenous rights can be addressed.

[Conceptions in dispute in the use of micronutrient supplementation and/or fortification in school programs for prevention of anemia]. / Concepções em disputa no uso da suplementação e/ou fortificação de micronutrientes na alimentação escolar para prevenção da anemia.

Iron deficiency anemia affects different populations worldwide, and in Brazil it is one of the principal childhood nutritional deficiencies. Different strategies have been proposed by international agencies and the Brazilian Ministry of Health for its prevention. The study aimed to analyze the ideas in dispute, expressed in official documents and narratives by health and education workers concerning the use of nutritional supplementation and/or fortification as a measure in schools to prevent anemia. The study was based on government documents and semi-structured interviews with workers in municipalities that implemented the school food fortification strategy (NutriSUS) in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The ideas expressed in the government documents highlight the efficiency of home supplementation and fortification for prevention of anemia, based on scientific studies and adjusted to the objectives of the public policies set out in them. Some ideas in the workers' narratives are critical of the need for this type of intervention, others they favor them, indicating controversies in the process of local operationalization of federal policies. Tensions were observed in the concepts of promotion, prevention, and treatment through NutriSUS, dosage, and form of administration. Criticisms of supplementation highlight healthy eating practices as the best strategy. Medicalization rather than health promotion measures can strain the pedagogical perspective in schools and produce contradictory ideas on the best strategies for the promotion of healthy eating.

A anemia por deficiência de ferro afeta, mundialmente, diferentes populações e, no Brasil, é uma das principais carências nutricionais na infância. Diferentes estratégias são propostas por organismos internacionais e pelo Ministério da Saúde para sua prevenção. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar as ideias em disputa, presentes em documentos oficiais e narrativas dos profissionais da saúde e educação acerca do uso da suplementação e/ou fortificação nutricional como medida de prevenção da anemia no âmbito escolar. Baseou-se na análise de documentos governamentais e entrevistas semiestruturadas com profissionais atuantes em municípios que implementaram a estratégia de fortificação da alimentação escolar (NutriSUS) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. As ideias disseminadas nos documentos governamentais ressaltam a eficiência da suplementação e da fortificação caseira para prevenção de anemia, com base em pesquisas científicas e se adequa aos objetivos das políticas públicas neles formalizados. As ideias presentes nas narrativas dos profissionais são, por vezes, críticas à necessidade desse tipo de intervenção e, por outras, favoráveis, indicando as controvérsias presentes no próprio processo de operacionalização local das políticas federais. Observaram-se tensões em torno dos conceitos de promoção, prevenção e tratamento por meio do NutriSUS, da dosagem e da forma de administração. As críticas à suplementação ressaltam as práticas alimentares saudáveis como estratégia preferencial. A medicalização em detrimento de ações de promoção da saúde pode tencionar a perspectiva pedagógica no contexto escolar e produzir ideias contraditórias sobre as melhores estratégias de promoção de alimentação saudável.

La anemia por deficiencia de hierro afecta mundialmente a diferentes poblaciones y, en Brasil, es una de las principales carencias nutricionales durante la infancia. Se proponen diferentes estrategias por parte de organismos internacionales y el Ministerio de Salud para su prevención. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las ideas en disputa, presentes en documentos oficiales y narraciones de los profesionales de salud y educación, acerca del uso de los suplementos y/o enriquecimientos nutricionales, como medida de prevención de la anemia en el ámbito escolar. Se basó en el análisis de documentos gubernamentales y entrevistas semiestructuradas con profesionales que actuaban en municipios que implementaron la estrategia de fortificación de la alimentación escolar (NutriSUS) en el estado de Río de Janeiro. Las ideas difundidas en los documentos gubernamentales resaltan la eficiencia de la suplementación y del enriquecimiento alimenticio casero para la prevención de anemia, basadas investigaciones científicas, y se adecua a los objetivos de las políticas públicas en ellos formalizados. Las ideas presentes en las narraciones de los profesionales son, a veces, críticas con la necesidad de este tipo de intervención y, otras veces, favorables, indicando las controversias presentes en el propio proceso de operacionalización local de las políticas federales. Se observaron tensiones en torno a los conceptos de promoción, prevención y tratamiento mediante NutriSUS, así como sobre la dosificación y la forma de administración. Las críticas a los suplementos resaltan las prácticas alimentarias saludables como estrategia preferente. La medicalización en detrimento de acciones de promoción de la salud puede tensionar la perspectiva pedagógica en el contexto escolar y producir ideas contradictorias sobre las mejores estrategias de promoción de alimentación saludable.

Concepções em disputa no uso da suplementação e/ou fortificação de micronutrientes na alimentação escolar para prevenção da anemia / Conceptions in dispute in the use of micronutrient supplementation and/or fortification in school programs for prevention of anemia / Concepciones en disputa en el uso del uso de suplementos y/o enriquecimiento de micronutrientes en la alimentación escolar para la prevención de la anemia

Resumo: A anemia por deficiência de ferro afeta, mundialmente, diferentes populações e, no Brasil, é uma das principais carências nutricionais na infância. Diferentes estratégias são propostas por organismos internacionais e pelo Ministério da Saúde para sua prevenção. O objetivo do estudo foi analisar as ideias em disputa, presentes em documentos oficiais e narrativas dos profissionais da saúde e educação acerca do uso da suplementação e/ou fortificação nutricional como medida de prevenção da anemia no âmbito escolar. Baseou-se na análise de documentos governamentais e entrevistas semiestruturadas com profissionais atuantes em municípios que implementaram a estratégia de fortificação da alimentação escolar (NutriSUS) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. As ideias disseminadas nos documentos governamentais ressaltam a eficiência da suplementação e da fortificação caseira para prevenção de anemia, com base em pesquisas científicas e se adequa aos objetivos das políticas públicas neles formalizados. As ideias presentes nas narrativas dos profissionais são, por vezes, críticas à necessidade desse tipo de intervenção e, por outras, favoráveis, indicando as controvérsias presentes no próprio processo de operacionalização local das políticas federais. Observaram-se tensões em torno dos conceitos de promoção, prevenção e tratamento por meio do NutriSUS, da dosagem e da forma de administração. As críticas à suplementação ressaltam as práticas alimentares saudáveis como estratégia preferencial. A medicalização em detrimento de ações de promoção da saúde pode tencionar a perspectiva pedagógica no contexto escolar e produzir ideias contraditórias sobre as melhores estratégias de promoção de alimentação saudável.

Abstract: Iron deficiency anemia affects different populations worldwide, and in Brazil it is one of the principal childhood nutritional deficiencies. Different strategies have been proposed by international agencies and the Brazilian Ministry of Health for its prevention. The study aimed to analyze the ideas in dispute, expressed in official documents and narratives by health and education workers concerning the use of nutritional supplementation and/or fortification as a measure in schools to prevent anemia. The study was based on government documents and semi-structured interviews with workers in municipalities that implemented the school food fortification strategy (NutriSUS) in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The ideas expressed in the government documents highlight the efficiency of home supplementation and fortification for prevention of anemia, based on scientific studies and adjusted to the objectives of the public policies set out in them. Some ideas in the workers' narratives are critical of the need for this type of intervention, others they favor them, indicating controversies in the process of local operationalization of federal policies. Tensions were observed in the concepts of promotion, prevention, and treatment through NutriSUS, dosage, and form of administration. Criticisms of supplementation highlight healthy eating practices as the best strategy. Medicalization rather than health promotion measures can strain the pedagogical perspective in schools and produce contradictory ideas on the best strategies for the promotion of healthy eating.

Resumen: La anemia por deficiencia de hierro afecta mundialmente a diferentes poblaciones y, en Brasil, es una de las principales carencias nutricionales durante la infancia. Se proponen diferentes estrategias por parte de organismos internacionales y el Ministerio de Salud para su prevención. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las ideas en disputa, presentes en documentos oficiales y narraciones de los profesionales de salud y educación, acerca del uso de los suplementos y/o enriquecimientos nutricionales, como medida de prevención de la anemia en el ámbito escolar. Se basó en el análisis de documentos gubernamentales y entrevistas semiestructuradas con profesionales que actuaban en municipios que implementaron la estrategia de fortificación de la alimentación escolar (NutriSUS) en el estado de Río de Janeiro. Las ideas difundidas en los documentos gubernamentales resaltan la eficiencia de la suplementación y del enriquecimiento alimenticio casero para la prevención de anemia, basadas investigaciones científicas, y se adecua a los objetivos de las políticas públicas en ellos formalizados. Las ideas presentes en las narraciones de los profesionales son, a veces, críticas con la necesidad de este tipo de intervención y, otras veces, favorables, indicando las controversias presentes en el propio proceso de operacionalización local de las políticas federales. Se observaron tensiones en torno a los conceptos de promoción, prevención y tratamiento mediante NutriSUS, así como sobre la dosificación y la forma de administración. Las críticas a los suplementos resaltan las prácticas alimentarias saludables como estrategia preferente. La medicalización en detrimento de acciones de promoción de la salud puede tensionar la perspectiva pedagógica en el contexto escolar y producir ideas contradictorias sobre las mejores estrategias de promoción de alimentación saludable.

Absolutely Right and Relatively Good: Consequentialists See Bioethical Disagreement in a Relativist Light.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary societies are rife with moral disagreement, resulting in recalcitrant disputes on matters of public policy. In the context of ongoing bioethical controversies, are uncompromising attitudes rooted in beliefs about the nature of moral truth? METHODS: To answer this question, we conducted both exploratory and confirmatory studies, with both a convenience and a nationally representative sample (total N = 1501), investigating the link between people's beliefs about moral truth (their metaethics) and their beliefs about moral value (their normative ethics). RESULTS: Across various bioethical issues (e.g., medically-assisted death, vaccine hesitancy, surrogacy, mandatory organ conscription, or genetically modified crops), consequentialist attitudes were associated with weaker beliefs in an objective moral truth. This association was not explained by domain-general reflectivity, theism, personality, normative uncertainty, or subjective knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: We find a robust link between the way people characterize prescriptive disagreements and their sensibility to consequences. In addition, both societal consensus and personal conviction contribute to objectivist beliefs, but these effects appear to be asymmetric, i.e., stronger for opposition than for approval.

['A case of decapitation'; calamity investigation in 1822]. / 'Het geval van onthoofting'.

A case of childbirth with a fatal outcome described in the book 'The King's Court Physician: the Adventurous Life of Franz Joseph Harbaur, 1776-1822' (De lijfarts van de koning. Het avontuurlijkeleven van Franz Joseph Harbaur, 1776-1822) puts the work of the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate into an historical context by pointing out the similarities between a calamity investigation held in 1822 and the situation today. Conflicts between medical disciplinary law and criminal law, boundary disputes between various professions (in this particular case midwives and gynaecologists) and questions of openness and transparency turn out to be nothing new. By doing case studies on how to deal with calamities, it is possible to gain insight into medical failures of the past and how they were managed. It is also possible to get a better picture of the expectations that medicine had to meet in the past, and how, and under what circumstances, these have changed. This information is of value in making choices in today's healthcare system.

Transgender and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents: Fact-Checking of AAP Policy.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recently published a policy statement: Ensuring comprehensive care and support for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents. Although almost all clinics and professional associations in the world use what's called the watchful waiting approach to helping gender diverse (GD) children, the AAP statement instead rejected that consensus, endorsing gender affirmation as the only acceptable approach. Remarkably, not only did the AAP statement fail to include any of the actual outcomes literature on such cases, but it also misrepresented the contents of its citations, which repeatedly said the very opposite of what AAP attributed to them.

Parens Patriae and Parental Rights: When Should the State Override Parental Medical Decisions?

Alfie Evans was a terminally ill British child whose parents, clinging to hope, were desperately trying to save his life. Hospital authorities disagreed and petitioned the court to enjoin the parents from removing him and taking him elsewhere for treatment. The court stepped in and compelled the hospital to discontinue life support and claimed that further treatment was not in the child's best interest. This note discusses the heartbreaking stories of Alfie and two other children whose parents' medical decisions on their behalf were overridden by the court. It argues that courts should never decide that death is in a child's best interest and compel parents to withdraw life support from their children. Such a decision is outside the scope of the judiciary. Furthermore, it argues that even in those instances when the court may or must intervene, a new framework is necessary because the current framework used by the court to determine the best interest of the child ignores fundamental realities of child psychology. Too often, as a result of the court's mistaken framework, the court illegitimately trespasses into the parental domain. By adopting a new framework, the court will intervene only when actual abuse or neglect is suspected. In all other cases, judicial restraint will be practiced and the court will show greater deference to the parents' wishes.

Dietary Fat and Cardiovascular Disease: Ebb and Flow Over the Last Half Century.

Dietary modification has been the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention since the middle of the last century when the American Heart Association (AHA) first issued recommendations. For the vast majority of that time the focus has been on saturated fat, with or without concomitant guidance for total or unsaturated fat. Over the past few years there has been a renewed debate about the relation between dietary saturated fat and CVD risk, prompted by a series of systematic reviews that have come to what appears to be different conclusions. This triggered a robust discourse about this controversy in the media that in turn has led to confusion in the general public. The genesis of the different conclusions among the systematic reviews has been identified in several studies on the basis of isocaloric substitution analyses. When the data were analyzed on the basis of polyunsaturated fat replacing saturated fat, there was a positive relation between dietary saturated fat and CVD. When the data were analyzed on the basis of carbohydrate replacing saturated fat, there was a null relation between dietary saturated fat and CVD. When the substitution macronutrient was not taken into consideration, the differential effects of the macronutrient substitution went unrecognized and the relations judged as null. The lack of distinction among substituted macronutrients accounted for much of what appeared to be discrepancies. Dietary guidance consistent with replacing foods high in saturated fat with foods high in unsaturated fat, first recommended more than 50 y ago, remains appropriate to this day.

Transitions, Suicidality, and Underappreciated Autism Spectrum Disorder in a High School Student.

CASE: Alex is a 14-year-old Portuguese-American boy with a psychiatric history starting at age 5 who presents to your primary care practice after an insurance change.He was delivered prematurely at 32 weeks and diagnosed with congenital hypothyroidism at the age of 6 weeks and growth hormone deficiency at the age of 2 years; he is in active treatment for both. He otherwise met developmental milestones on time yet continues to have significant fatigue despite adequate sleep and vitamin D supplementation.His family history is remarkable for maternal anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and previous attempted suicide, as well as anxiety, alcoholism, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the extended family.Alex has had multiple psychiatric diagnoses by sequential providers. He was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder and ADHD by 5 years of age, major depressive disorder by 11 years of age, persistent depressive disorder by 12 years of age, and ultimately disruptive mood dysregulation disorder because of severe and persistent temper outbursts associated with negative mood and behavioral dysregulation, leading to recurrent crisis evaluations. He has been psychiatrically hospitalized twice, in the fifth and seventh grade, for suicidal ideation (SI) and elopement from home, respectively. He recently completed a 2-week acute residential placement, during which no medication changes were made. Current medications include escitalopram 20 mg daily, guanfacine 1 mg 3 times daily, sustained release bupropion 100 mg twice daily, levothyroxine, vitamin D, and a weekly somatropin injection. He has not been able to tolerate psychostimulants or nonstimulant agents because of treatment-emergent SI.Now in the ninth grade, he continues to be easily distracted by peers, with impulsive behaviors and reduced self-regulation. Despite receiving special education services since the fifth grade, his academic performance has been poor, and he has limited motivation. Previous testing indicated average in an intelligence quotient test, with relative deficits in working memory compared with above average strength in fluid reasoning. He dislikes school and has few friends. He has always been noted to be "immature." He displays temper tantrums at home and school around transitions and behavioral expectations and has complained of feeling "different" and misunderstood by peers in addition to having difficulty reading social cues. His interests include acting and playing Fortnite and other video/computer games. His screen time is limited to 1 to 2 hr/d by the family.As the new clinician, you raise the possibility of undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder as a unifying/underlying diagnosis with his mother, who disagrees and does not consent to additional workup despite your recommendations. How would you proceed with next steps to best support your patient and his family in obtaining further clarifying evaluation?

Science communication activism: Protesting Traditional Chinese Medicine in China.

This article investigates how activists use science communication to protest the regulation and use of Traditional Chinese Medicine in China. The article reports on a participant observation study of the motivations of the activists as well as the form and content of their activities. The article hereby questions the apparently close links between the systems of state and science in China. It also points to different configurations of the relationship between scientists, activists, science communication and publics than what has been common in analyses of science communication and activism in Western countries.

Potential conflicts in midwifery practice regarding conscientious objection to abortions in Scotland.

BACKGROUND:: This study was developed as a result of a court case involving conflicts between midwives' professional practice and their faith when caring for women undergoing abortions in Scotland. RESEARCH QUESTIONS:: What are practising Roman Catholics' perspectives of potential conflicts between midwives' professional practice in Scotland with regard to involvement in abortions and their faith? How relevant is the 'conscience clause' to midwifery practice today? and What are participants' understandings of Canon 1398 in relation to midwifery practice? RESEARCH DESIGN:: The theoretical underpinning of this study was Gadamer's hermeneutic out of which the method developed by Fleming et al. involving a five-stage approach was utilised. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT:: The research was conducted in the south of Scotland. A purposive sampling method was used. Eight participants who were practising Roman Catholics familiar with the subject of conscientious objection who were either midwives, lawyers (civil, canon or both) or priests contributed. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:: The major ethical issues related to respect for autonomy, maintaining confidentiality and obtaining voluntary informed consent. Parish priests agreed to act as gatekeepers to prospective participants. All legal requirements were addressed regarding data collection and storage. Approval was given by the ethics committee of the university with which one of the researchers were associated. FINDINGS:: Three key themes provide an understanding of the situation in which midwives find themselves when considering the care for a woman admitted for an abortion: competing legal systems, competing views of conscience and limits of participation. CONCLUSION:: Clear guidelines for practice should be developed by a multi-professional and consumer group based on an update of the abortion law to reflect the change from a surgical to medical procedure. Clarification of Canon 1398 in relation to what is and is not participation in the procurement of abortion would be of benefit to midwives with a conscientious objection.

Rethinking Brain Death as a Legal Fiction: Is the Terminology the Problem?

Brain death, or the determination of death by neurological criteria, has been described as a legal fiction. Legal fictions are devices by which the law treats two analogous things (in this case, biological death and brain death) in the same way so that the law developed for one can also cover the other. Some scholars argue that brain death should be understood as a fiction for two reasons: the way brain death is determined does not actually satisfy legal criteria requiring the permanent cessation of all brain function, and brain death is not consistent with the biological conception of death as involving the irreversible cessation of the functioning of an organism as a whole. Critics counter that the idea that brain death is a legal fiction is deceptive and undemocratic. I will argue that diagnosing brain death as a hidden legal fiction is a helpful way to understand its historical development and current status. For the legal-fictions approach to be ethically justifiable, however, the fact that brain death is a legal fiction not aligned with the standard biological conception of death must be acknowledged and made transparent.